Cover of The Mists of AvalonLet me tell you. I missed the boat on this one. Most people that didn't read it upon its release in 1982, read this in high school. Not I. I waited an extra 20 years so I could have some perspective. In high school, I read Mary Stewarts take on the same legend. Very good I would recommend it as well. Currently, I am not huge on Fantasy. I just don't get into it that much, maybe because of the cliches that Nick pointed out on a post several years ago. I will pick some up from time to time, but always with concern. I have been burnt by good fantasy and bad. Considering the source material was well loved and 30 years old, I felt safe with this one.
We all know what this story is about, it is an Arthurian Legend. This book takes the point of view of Morgaine, Arthur's sister. It is possibly the most widely accepted contemporary telling of the legend. Marion Zimmer Bradley has not wowwed me in the past but this one is good.
Plot- It is King Arthur, we all know what is going to happen. Or do we? Bradley changes quite a bit. She made it her own, dawg. She took the frame of the legend and built her own creation on it.
Characters-Halfway through the book I hated every single character. The were well written, maybe a bit one dimensional, but I hated them. A couple were redeemed later, but at one point I toyed with putting the book down because there was not one single redeaming character. Overall it was good though. I think the fact that she could make me despise the characters so much was because I had grown to care about them.
Overall the book was good. I have heard it called a feminist take on the subject and I partially agree with that. It has strong women characters, but they are generally seen as evil or ignorant. I think high school is about the right age to read this book, but I don't think older readers will be disappointed. Subject matter and sexuality makes it unsuitable to a less mature audience.
Traitor's Sun
Posts
